Topics:Denuclearization

Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization.

Team

• Devin
• Lucy

(authors and sources listed alphabetically)

Arguments

Pro arguments Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors Issues with nuclear weapon security & maintenance Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal	Con arguments It’s too late Freedom & Self-determination Stability Lack of enforcement ability

Vote Pre-Discussion

Become a member/Login and vote You are not logged in. In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can log in or create an account.

|- ! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" | Become a member/Login and vote |- | |- | style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" | You are not logged in. In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can log in or create an account. |} |}</nowiki>-->