Main Page: Difference between revisions
Mauricezaki (talk | contribs) m styling update for book section |
Mauricezaki (talk | contribs) m adding more copy and design elements |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;" | {| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | Welcome to Unifiers' Movement, | ! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | | ||
the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues. | =Welcome to Unifiers' Movement,= | ||
<small>the [[Balanced Arguments]] to [[Global Issues]].</small> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> | | style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. Accessibility and open feedback from the public can evaluate its effect and prevent it from being misled because an important element was left out of consideration. UM embraces valid differences that complement positions on an issue and bring unique contributions to the table. It will seek to remove doubts of authenticity from expert evidence it presents to non-experts through transparency and disclosure of all conflicts of interest. Every defendable vote will count to assess relative positions to the recommendations of the experts, remaining sensitive to the work that still needs to be done to achieve a robust unifying balance. UM is a platform of expert team positions representing entire fields surrounding an issue, with no agenda of profiting in any way (e.g., financially or through influence and power) from its goal to unify people behind the wisest views on the issue. Informed decisions are likely to avert crises or failure to identify elements that should not be lying in the margins. Ethical boundaries promise to keep us in check. The hope is that UM will unify people to seek positions that serve most people rather than a few with special interests. ([[about_UM|Read more...]]) | UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. Accessibility and open feedback from the public can evaluate its effect and prevent it from being misled because an important element was left out of consideration. UM embraces valid differences that complement positions on an issue and bring unique contributions to the table. It will seek to remove doubts of authenticity from expert evidence it presents to non-experts through transparency and disclosure of all conflicts of interest. Every defendable vote will count to assess relative positions to the recommendations of the experts, remaining sensitive to the work that still needs to be done to achieve a robust unifying balance. UM is a platform of expert team positions representing entire fields surrounding an issue, with no agenda of profiting in any way (e.g., financially or through influence and power) from its goal to unify people behind the wisest views on the issue. Informed decisions are likely to avert crises or failure to identify elements that should not be lying in the margins. Ethical boundaries promise to keep us in check. The hope is that UM will unify people to seek positions that serve most people rather than a few with special interests. ([[about_UM|Read more...]]) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2" | <div style="background-color:# | | colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div> | ||
<div id="mp-tfp" > | <div id="mp-tfp" > | ||
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 3px 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"> | <table role="presentation" style="margin:0 3px 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span> | <td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems! | This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems! | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align: left; / | |||
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to: the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p> | |||
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit: John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically) </small></p> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 24 March 2025
Welcome to Unifiers' Movement,the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
From Today's Controversial Topic
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used in many applications in Society and its future appears to be limitless. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con" and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of AI. AI is hotly debated because the risks and benefits are so far from each other on either end of the spectrum. (Full topic...) Credit: Amiji, A; Brown, K; Estevam, J; Holbrook, O; Meng, Z; Oh, S; Pentikis, J; Przybyla, A; Sevilla, R (authors and sources listed alphabetically) |
Today's Topic Discussion
| |||
|
About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. Accessibility and open feedback from the public can evaluate its effect and prevent it from being misled because an important element was left out of consideration. UM embraces valid differences that complement positions on an issue and bring unique contributions to the table. It will seek to remove doubts of authenticity from expert evidence it presents to non-experts through transparency and disclosure of all conflicts of interest. Every defendable vote will count to assess relative positions to the recommendations of the experts, remaining sensitive to the work that still needs to be done to achieve a robust unifying balance. UM is a platform of expert team positions representing entire fields surrounding an issue, with no agenda of profiting in any way (e.g., financially or through influence and power) from its goal to unify people behind the wisest views on the issue. Informed decisions are likely to avert crises or failure to identify elements that should not be lying in the margins. Ethical boundaries promise to keep us in check. The hope is that UM will unify people to seek positions that serve most people rather than a few with special interests. (Read more...) | ||||
Unifiers' Movement Book
| ||||
