https://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=MauricezakiUNIFIERS' MOVEMENT - User contributions [en]2026-04-23T22:33:59ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.44.2https://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=185Main Page2025-04-29T17:06:51Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
===WELCOME TO UNIFIERS' MOVEMENT=== <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Denuclearization|Denuclearization]]''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. <br />
<br />
Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. ([[Topics:Denuclearization|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Devin; Lucy''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
<br />
<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Previous Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
'''[[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Genetically Modified Organisms]]''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. <br />
<br />
Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. ([[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Jahnavi; Noah''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=184Main Page2025-04-25T14:10:42Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
===WELCOME TO UNIFIERS' MOVEMENT=== <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Denuclearization|Denuclearization]]''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. ([[Topics:Denuclearization|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Devin; Lucy''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
<br />
<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Previous Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
'''[[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Genetically Modified Organisms]]''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. ([[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Jahnavi; Noah''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=183Main Page2025-04-25T14:09:57Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
===Welcome to Unifiers' Movement=== <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Denuclearization|Denuclearization]]''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. ([[Topics:Denuclearization|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Devin; Lucy''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
<br />
<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Previous Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
'''[[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Genetically Modified Organisms]]''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. ([[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Jahnavi; Noah''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=182Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-25T14:03:27Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_DA_PrePost.png&diff=181File:Denuclearization DA PrePost.png2025-04-25T14:02:53Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization DA PrePost</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=180Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-25T12:02:50Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=179Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-25T12:01:44Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png|Plasticity for Denuclearization Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_Plasticity_CON.png&diff=178File:Denuclearization Plasticity CON.png2025-04-25T11:59:26Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization Plasticity CON</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_Plasticity_PRO.png&diff=177File:Denuclearization Plasticity PRO.png2025-04-25T11:59:02Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization Plasticity PRO</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_SeeSaw_post.png&diff=176File:Denuclearization SeeSaw post.png2025-04-25T11:56:28Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization SeeSaw post</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=175Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-25T11:40:17Z<p>Mauricezaki: update Pre Discussion SeeSaw Model</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_SeeSaw_Pre_(1).png&diff=174File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre (1).png2025-04-25T11:39:24Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre V2</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=173Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-23T18:20:14Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=172Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-22T13:13:37Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!-- add login box here --><br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/hWgPE7osodTaowdC6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=171Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-22T13:10:24Z<p>Mauricezaki: Post Discussion Survey</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:Denuclearization DA.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!-- add login box here --><br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_DA.png&diff=170File:Denuclearization DA.png2025-04-22T13:05:29Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization DA</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Denuclearization_SeeSaw_Pre.png&diff=169File:Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre.png2025-04-22T13:05:09Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Denuclearization SeeSaw Pre</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=168Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-18T21:19:22Z<p>Mauricezaki: Final Results</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. A major challenge is that once GMO crops are released into the environment, they are difficult to recall. Cross-pollination with non-GMO crops can occur, making containment nearly impossible. Additionally, despite assurances from regulatory bodies like the FDA and WHO that GMO foods are safe, the lack of comprehensive, long-term safety studies and the rising prevalence of food allergies raise public concern. Further complicating matters, some countries do not have mandatory GMO labeling laws, leading to increased distrust among consumers. Greater transparency, ongoing safety research, and robust labeling regulations could help address these concerns and build public confidence in GMO foods.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
#Increased Crop Yields<br />
#:GMOs can be engineered to grow faster, resist pests, or tolerate harsh environmental conditions, which helps farmers produce more food on the same amount of land. This is especially important in regions facing food insecurity or with limited arable land. Higher yields contribute to global food supply stability and can reduce pressure to convert natural ecosystems into farmland.<br />
#Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases<br />
#:Many GMO crops are modified to be resistant to pests or diseases that would otherwise require chemical pesticides. For example, Bt corn produces a natural insecticide that protects it from destructive pests like the corn borer. This reduces the need for external pesticide use, which can lower environmental impact and production costs for farmers.<br />
#Enhanced Nutritional Content<br />
#:GMOs can be designed to address specific nutrient deficiencies in populations. A well-known example is Golden Rice, which has been engineered to contain higher levels of vitamin A to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. This approach offers a sustainable, food-based solution to malnutrition-related health issues.<br />
#Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate<br />
#:Genetically modified crops can be engineered to withstand drought, salinity, heat, and other climate-related stresses. As climate change increasingly affects agriculture worldwide, GMOs offer a way to adapt food systems to changing environmental conditions and ensure consistent food production even under adverse weather.<br />
#Reduced Environmental Impact<br />
#:Because GMO crops can be engineered to resist pests and tolerate herbicides more effectively, farmers can adopt practices like no-till farming and use fewer chemical inputs. This can lead to less soil erosion, reduced water contamination, and overall lower carbon emissions associated with food production.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#Lack of safety studies<br />
#:There aren’t enough studies to confirm the long-term safety of the GMO foods. Without any credible and independent feeding studies, it’s hard to tell if GMO foods are really safe<br />
#Increased Herbicide use<br />
#:GMO crops were engineered to be herbicide resistant intended to reduce chemical use. However this has led to increased reliance on the herbicides like glyphosate for controlling weeds and this led to the evolution of superweeds. Framers now use even larger quantities of herbicides and additional chemicals to control weeds. This is one example that shows how short-term solutions can lead to long-term environmental consequences.<br />
#Environmental contamination<br />
#:Once released into the environment, GMO foods cannot be recalled as they cross-pollinate and can cause unintended spread of GMO traits to wild plants threatening biodiversity and purity of organic produce.<br />
#Allergen and Health risk<br />
#:Genetic alteration of the DNA can lead to production of some proteinaceous allergens that can trigger the immune system.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw GMO Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DrivingArguments.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO Plasticity ProArguments.png|Plasticity for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:GMO Plasticity ConArguments.png|Plasticity for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw GMO Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DrivingArguments.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO Plasticity ProArguments.png|Plasticity for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:GMO Plasticity ConArguments.png|Plasticity for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_Plasticity_ConArguments.png&diff=167File:GMO Plasticity ConArguments.png2025-04-18T21:18:25Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO Plasticity ConArguments</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_Plasticity_ProArguments.png&diff=166File:GMO Plasticity ProArguments.png2025-04-18T21:18:07Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO Plasticity ProArguments</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_DrivingArguments.png&diff=165File:GMO DrivingArguments.png2025-04-18T21:15:21Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO DrivingArguments Post</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_SeeSaw_GMO_Post.png&diff=164File:GMO SeeSaw GMO Post.png2025-04-18T21:14:54Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO SeeSaw GMO Post</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=163Main Page2025-04-17T23:04:57Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
=Welcome to Unifiers' Movement= <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Denuclearization|Denuclearization]]''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. ([[Topics:Denuclearization|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Devin; Lucy''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
<br />
<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Previous Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
'''[[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Genetically Modified Organisms]]''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. ([[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Jahnavi; Noah''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=162Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T23:01:50Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!-- add login box here --><br />
<br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=161Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T23:01:01Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
#{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; #width:100%;"<br />
#{{!}}-<br />
#{{!}} <br />
#{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-#color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; #width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
#{{!}}-<br />
#! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px #solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-#size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
#{{!}}-<br />
#{{!}}<br />
#{{!}}-<br />
#{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px #12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, #view results, be notified when there are updates, you can #[{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or #[{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an #account].<br />
#{{!}}}<br />
#{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=160Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T22:55:40Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<nowiki>{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}</nowiki>--><br />
<br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=159Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T22:55:01Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
<nowiki>{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}</nowiki><br />
<br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=158Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T22:53:40Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
--><br />
| <br />
<!--<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Denuclearization&diff=157Topics:Denuclearization2025-04-17T22:50:06Z<p>Mauricezaki: New Topic - Denuclearization</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Denuclearization''''' (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Denuclearization. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Devin<br />
* Lucy<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash</li><br />
<li>Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors</li><br />
<li>Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance</li><br />
<li>Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities</li><br />
<li>The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>It’s too late</li><br />
<li>Freedom &amp; Self-determination</li><br />
<li>Stability</li><br />
<li>Lack of enforcement ability</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/MtgzieCEKe7cETtL6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Denuclearization Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Denuclearization Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Denuclearization (or Nuclear Disarmament) is an argument for the partial or<br />
complete dismantling of nuclear weapons. Specifically, for nuclear warheads such as the two nuclear bombs used by the American military to attack the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Following World War II, this has been a strongly advocated diplomatic approach between nations resulting in several international treaties. In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs making the development and management of nuclear stockpiles a critical part of international policies. Pro-nuclear arguments have been made on the grounds of deterrence and protection from aggressors for smaller countries, while anti-nuclear arguments focus on the unique destructive power of these weapons should they ever actually be used and on the security concerns regarding what state and non-state actors might end up in possession of one.<br />
<br />
‘FOR’ Argument: Nuclear weapons allow smaller nations a large-scale destructive<br />
power against larger nations to deter potential invasions. Additionally, the already existing technology is widely known, and it is impossible to suppress threat actors from wielding it.<br />
<br />
‘AGAINST’ Argument: The perceived protection of nuclear weapons against other<br />
nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
Several renowned scientists, military officials, and long-time diplomats have<br />
advocated for denuclearization given its perception of protection against other nations’ nuclear programs does not compensate for the reality of security concerns, health risks, and costs of maintenance and disposal.<br />
#Ineffective to use nuclear weapons while fearing swift nuclear backlash<br />
#:In recent years, more nations have developed nuclear programs allowing access to nuclear-grade weapons. While there is a perceived, theoretical benefit of protection by possessing these weapons, in practice there is no sound strategic argument for deploying these weapons against a nuclear-armed actor without fearing equally destructive retaliation. Rather than other nations, the more likely threat actors to utilize such weapons are terrorist groups who would not fear such suicidal consequences thus rendering a nuclear stockpile to be ineffective.<br />
#Nuclear innovation drives development that could fall into the hands of violent threat actors<br />
#:The push for innovating nuclear weapons to maintain or expand the current stockpile means developing smaller, sleeker, and more destructive weapons. This risks the devices and resources from these innovations falling into the hands of terrorist groups who, as mentioned above, are more likely to deploy nuclear weapons without fearing consequences on themselves.<br />
#Issues with nuclear weapon security &amp; maintenance<br />
#:There have been documented security failings by the military forces responsible for overseeing these weapons that could be exploited by violent threat actors. Additionally, there is an astronomical amount of funding allocated to developing and maintaining the current U.S. nuclear stockpile.<br />
#Safety concerns for citizens located near nuclear facilities<br />
#:In the United States, there have been an estimated 30-1,000 incidents of nuclear mishaps from the mishandling of nuclear-grade weapons. The severity has ranged from miraculously no casualties to several deaths even without widespread nuclear detonation. This could impact people living nearby within the immediate blast radius and could contaminate the environment for a much wider population.<br />
#The dangers of nuclear waste storage and disposal<br />
#:The historic failing to properly handle nuclear waste from dismantled weapons and nuclear power plants would be further exacerbated by contributions from future weapons if planning to maintain the current nuclear stockpile.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#It’s too late<br />
#:nuclear weapons are by far the most destructive invention in the history of humanity. Many would argue that their invention and initial development was highly unethical or immoral, and I’m not going to argue against that stance – the problem is that it has been too late to prevent their proliferation for decades now. In the state of the world now, a country owning nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent against other countries using their own nuclear weapons or going to conventional war, so the net effect ends up being positive in reducing the amount of war and violence in the world. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
#Freedom &amp; Self-determination<br />
#:Many people who argue in favor of gun ownership argue that guns are “force equalizers” in that they provide otherwise vulnerable people the ability to protect themselves from aggressors, no matter the physical strength or size of the aggressor. While I find this framing problematic for gun ownership, I think it is a great analogy for nuclear weapons; the deterrence from nuclear weapon ownership provides vulnerable countries with a force equalizer to maintain their rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the face of aggressors. You can see what has happened to former soviet states who voluntarily gave up their nuclear weapons (Ukraine, Belarus, Khazakstan) or who never had them (Georgia, Moldova) and what has happened to them since in the face of Russian aggression. Compare this to the protection from Russia that the Baltics now have under NATO’s nuclear umbrella or the cessation of conflict between Pakistan and India since both developing nuclear weapons. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in freedom/self-determination/rights based)<br />
#Stability<br />
#:Compared to the state of the world prior to and during WWII, the rate of war and conflict has actually gone down since the proliferation of nuclear weapons. You could argue that globalization, alliances, and international law have also contributed to this, but the existence of nuclear weapons in multiple spheres of influence around the world has certainly limited who can attack who in terms of conventional war without fear of nuclear repercussion. Ethical framing: utilitarian or deontological (anti-war)<br />
#Lack of enforcement ability<br />
#:The problem with the Nonproliferation treaties and with denuclearization in general is that once the technology is out there, it is extremely difficult to determine with 100% certainty that either state or non-state actors have gotten rid of all their nuclear weapons. Any country or non-state actor having even a single nuclear weapon gives them the ability to flatten a city, which provides an extremely strong incentive to not get rid of all their nuclear weapons, even if they say that they are going to. This incentive structure will punish countries who take the allegedly morally correct route of getting rid of their nukes while benefitting the countries who don’t by increasing their military power relative to the countries that follow the rules. Ethical framing: utilitarian<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Denuclearization" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=156Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-15T16:55:41Z<p>Mauricezaki: pre results and post survey added</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. A major challenge is that once GMO crops are released into the environment, they are difficult to recall. Cross-pollination with non-GMO crops can occur, making containment nearly impossible. Additionally, despite assurances from regulatory bodies like the FDA and WHO that GMO foods are safe, the lack of comprehensive, long-term safety studies and the rising prevalence of food allergies raise public concern. Further complicating matters, some countries do not have mandatory GMO labeling laws, leading to increased distrust among consumers. Greater transparency, ongoing safety research, and robust labeling regulations could help address these concerns and build public confidence in GMO foods.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
#Increased Crop Yields<br />
#:GMOs can be engineered to grow faster, resist pests, or tolerate harsh environmental conditions, which helps farmers produce more food on the same amount of land. This is especially important in regions facing food insecurity or with limited arable land. Higher yields contribute to global food supply stability and can reduce pressure to convert natural ecosystems into farmland.<br />
#Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases<br />
#:Many GMO crops are modified to be resistant to pests or diseases that would otherwise require chemical pesticides. For example, Bt corn produces a natural insecticide that protects it from destructive pests like the corn borer. This reduces the need for external pesticide use, which can lower environmental impact and production costs for farmers.<br />
#Enhanced Nutritional Content<br />
#:GMOs can be designed to address specific nutrient deficiencies in populations. A well-known example is Golden Rice, which has been engineered to contain higher levels of vitamin A to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. This approach offers a sustainable, food-based solution to malnutrition-related health issues.<br />
#Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate<br />
#:Genetically modified crops can be engineered to withstand drought, salinity, heat, and other climate-related stresses. As climate change increasingly affects agriculture worldwide, GMOs offer a way to adapt food systems to changing environmental conditions and ensure consistent food production even under adverse weather.<br />
#Reduced Environmental Impact<br />
#:Because GMO crops can be engineered to resist pests and tolerate herbicides more effectively, farmers can adopt practices like no-till farming and use fewer chemical inputs. This can lead to less soil erosion, reduced water contamination, and overall lower carbon emissions associated with food production.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#Lack of safety studies<br />
#:There aren’t enough studies to confirm the long-term safety of the GMO foods. Without any credible and independent feeding studies, it’s hard to tell if GMO foods are really safe<br />
#Increased Herbicide use<br />
#:GMO crops were engineered to be herbicide resistant intended to reduce chemical use. However this has led to increased reliance on the herbicides like glyphosate for controlling weeds and this led to the evolution of superweeds. Framers now use even larger quantities of herbicides and additional chemicals to control weeds. This is one example that shows how short-term solutions can lead to long-term environmental consequences.<br />
#Environmental contamination<br />
#:Once released into the environment, GMO foods cannot be recalled as they cross-pollinate and can cause unintended spread of GMO traits to wild plants threatening biodiversity and purity of organic produce.<br />
#Allergen and Health risk<br />
#:Genetic alteration of the DNA can lead to production of some proteinaceous allergens that can trigger the immune system.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_DA_Arguments_Pre_1C.png&diff=155File:GMO DA Arguments Pre 1C.png2025-04-15T16:54:34Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO DA Arguments Pre-Discussion</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:GMO_SeeSaw_Pre.png&diff=154File:GMO SeeSaw Pre.png2025-04-15T16:54:07Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>GMO SeeSaw Pre-Discussion</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=153Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-14T20:36:42Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<!--<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. A major challenge is that once GMO crops are released into the environment, they are difficult to recall. Cross-pollination with non-GMO crops can occur, making containment nearly impossible. Additionally, despite assurances from regulatory bodies like the FDA and WHO that GMO foods are safe, the lack of comprehensive, long-term safety studies and the rising prevalence of food allergies raise public concern. Further complicating matters, some countries do not have mandatory GMO labeling laws, leading to increased distrust among consumers. Greater transparency, ongoing safety research, and robust labeling regulations could help address these concerns and build public confidence in GMO foods.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
#Increased Crop Yields<br />
#:GMOs can be engineered to grow faster, resist pests, or tolerate harsh environmental conditions, which helps farmers produce more food on the same amount of land. This is especially important in regions facing food insecurity or with limited arable land. Higher yields contribute to global food supply stability and can reduce pressure to convert natural ecosystems into farmland.<br />
#Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases<br />
#:Many GMO crops are modified to be resistant to pests or diseases that would otherwise require chemical pesticides. For example, Bt corn produces a natural insecticide that protects it from destructive pests like the corn borer. This reduces the need for external pesticide use, which can lower environmental impact and production costs for farmers.<br />
#Enhanced Nutritional Content<br />
#:GMOs can be designed to address specific nutrient deficiencies in populations. A well-known example is Golden Rice, which has been engineered to contain higher levels of vitamin A to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. This approach offers a sustainable, food-based solution to malnutrition-related health issues.<br />
#Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate<br />
#:Genetically modified crops can be engineered to withstand drought, salinity, heat, and other climate-related stresses. As climate change increasingly affects agriculture worldwide, GMOs offer a way to adapt food systems to changing environmental conditions and ensure consistent food production even under adverse weather.<br />
#Reduced Environmental Impact<br />
#:Because GMO crops can be engineered to resist pests and tolerate herbicides more effectively, farmers can adopt practices like no-till farming and use fewer chemical inputs. This can lead to less soil erosion, reduced water contamination, and overall lower carbon emissions associated with food production.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
<br />
#Lack of safety studies<br />
#:There aren’t enough studies to confirm the long-term safety of the GMO foods. Without any credible and independent feeding studies, it’s hard to tell if GMO foods are really safe<br />
#Increased Herbicide use<br />
#:GMO crops were engineered to be herbicide resistant intended to reduce chemical use. However this has led to increased reliance on the herbicides like glyphosate for controlling weeds and this led to the evolution of superweeds. Framers now use even larger quantities of herbicides and additional chemicals to control weeds. This is one example that shows how short-term solutions can lead to long-term environmental consequences.<br />
#Environmental contamination<br />
#:Once released into the environment, GMO foods cannot be recalled as they cross-pollinate and can cause unintended spread of GMO traits to wild plants threatening biodiversity and purity of organic produce.<br />
#Allergen and Health risk<br />
#:Genetic alteration of the DNA can lead to production of some proteinaceous allergens that can trigger the immune system.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
--><br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/D4Wpyw8EBHFJpZRT7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
--><br />
<!--<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
--><br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=152Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-11T16:29:19Z<p>Mauricezaki: formatting</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing&diff=151Topics:Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing2025-04-11T16:28:55Z<p>Mauricezaki: formatting</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing''''', The debate over in utero gene editing and human cloning combines aspects of<br />
biotechnology, ethics, and public policy, raising questions about the boundaries of<br />
scientific intervention in human life. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Cavallaro, N.<br />
* Simhadri, J.<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Prevention of Genetic Diseases</li><br />
<li>Advancements in Regenerative Medicine</li><br />
<li>Support for Infertile Couples and Reproductive Autonomy</li><br />
<li>Acceleration of Biomedical Research</li><br />
<li>Potential Cost Savings in Healthcare</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Reduced Genetic Diversity</li><br />
<li>Safety Concerns</li><br />
<li>Premature Aging</li><br />
<li>Increased Risk of Biological Disorders</li><br />
<li>Potential for Misuse</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSes65emuElP5wZAuHjLYzODI4TPsX1YjUoWErzKd8vc4gvDFw/viewform" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:SeeSaw Gene Editing Pre-Discussion.png|SeeSaw Model for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GeneEditing DA v2 1col.jpg|Driving Argument Distribution for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSes65emuElP5wZAuHjLYzODI4TPsX1YjUoWErzKd8vc4gvDFw/viewform" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:SeeSaw Gene Editing Pre-Discussion.png|SeeSaw Model for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:GeneEditing DA v2 1col.jpg|Driving Argument Distribution for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
The debate over in utero gene editing and human cloning combines aspects of biotechnology, ethics, and public policy, raising questions about the boundaries of scientific intervention in human life. In utero gene editing, particularly through the CRISPR-Cas9 system, offers the potential to correct harmful genetic mutations in a fetus before birth. This approach could prevent diseases like cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anemia, reducing suffering and potentially improving long-term outcomes. However, safety concerns—especially the risk of off-target effects and long-term health impacts—remain significant. The 2018 case of Chinese scientist He Jiankui, who claimed to have created the first gene-edited babies, sparked global condemnation and highlighted the<br />
need for stringent international oversight. Human cloning, while distinct from gene editing, raises similarly complex technical, legal, and ethical questions. Cloning can be divided into two main categories: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning aims to create a genetically identical individual and would involve<br />
implanting a cloned embryo into a uterus to develop into a full-term baby. This process has never been successfully carried out in humans and is widely opposed due to high failure rates, developmental abnormalities, and serious ethical concerns regarding identity, autonomy, and dignity. In contrast, therapeutic cloning—also known as somatic cell nuclear transfer for stem cell research—creates cloned embryos not to produce a person, but to generate embryonic stem cells genetically matched to a patient. These stem cells hold significant promise for regenerative medicine, potentially allowing for<br />
personalized organ and tissue repair without the risk of immune rejection. However, therapeutic cloning remains controversial because it involves the creation and destruction of human embryos. These emerging technologies prompt difficult ethical and societal questions that require careful consideration. Concerns about a future of “designer babies”—where genetic traits are selected or enhanced—raise concerns of eugenics and social inequality. There is growing agreement that international cooperation, public dialogue, and ethical<br />
guidelines are essential to ensure responsible progress in these areas.2,4 Ultimately, while these biotechnologies could serve as powerful tools to combat disease and enhance human health, their use must be carefully governed to uphold human rights, dignity, and equity.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
# Prevention of Genetic Diseases<br />
#:Gene editing technologies like CRISPR offer the ability to correct mutations that cause inherited diseases such as sickle cell anemia, Huntington’s disease, and cystic fibrosis. By making these changes early—potentially even before birth—we can reduce or eliminate the burden of lifelong illnesses, improving health outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals and families.<br />
# Advancements in Regenerative Medicine<br />
#:Therapeutic cloning can produce genetically matched stem cells, which could be used to grow tissues or even organs for transplantation. This eliminates the risk of immune rejection and reduces the need for organ donors. In the future, it may enable treatments for conditions like spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease, or heart failure by regenerating damaged tissue.<br />
# Support for Infertile Couples and Reproductive Autonomy<br />
#:Reproductive cloning could offer a path to biological parenthood for individuals or couples who cannot conceive using traditional or assisted reproductive technologies. It would expand reproductive options, particularly for those with fertility issues, same-sex couples, or individuals who have lost a child and wish to have a genetically related child again.<br />
# Acceleration of Biomedical Research<br />
#:Both gene editing and therapeutic cloning provide powerful tools for studying human development and disease. Creating cloned cells or embryos for research purposes enables scientists to model genetic disorders, understand disease progression, and test potential treatments in ways that are more precise and human-relevant than animal models.<br />
# Potential Cost Savings in Healthcare<br />
#:By preventing genetic diseases before birth or treating them at the molecular level, gene editing could reduce the need for long-term medical care, hospitalizations, and drug therapies. Over time, this could lower healthcare costs for individuals, families, and public health systems—shifting the focus from managing disease to preventing it.<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
# Reduced Genetic Diversity<br />
#:Human cloning results in a lack of DNA diversity, which could make the population more susceptible to diseases and reduce resilience to environmental changes.<br />
# Safety Concerns<br />
#:There is insufficient data on the long-term safety and effects of human cloning, posing significant health risks.<br />
# Premature Aging<br />
#:Animal studies have shown that clones often experience premature aging due to the use of adult stem cells, potentially leading to shorter lifespans and age-related diseases.<br />
# Increased Risk of Biological Disorders<br />
#:Clones may be more prone to genetic abnormalities, including a higher likelihood of developing cancer and other health issues.<br />
# Potential for Misuse<br />
#:Advanced cloning technologies intended for medical purposes, such as organ transplantation, could be exploited by individuals with malicious intent, leading to ethical and legal dilemmas.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://forms.gle/pXCmLC7Dtgw2AYUr9" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:SeeSaw_GeneEditing_Post_v2.png|SeeSaw Model for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:DA GeneEditing v2.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:GeneEditing Plasticity PRO v2.png|Plasticity for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:GeneEditing Plasticity CON v2.png|thumb|Plasticity for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://forms.gle/pXCmLC7Dtgw2AYUr9" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:SeeSaw_GeneEditing_Post_v2.png|SeeSaw Model for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:DA GeneEditing v2.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:GeneEditing Plasticity PRO v2.png|Plasticity for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:GeneEditing Plasticity CON v2.png|thumb|Plasticity for Human Cloning/In Utero Gene Editing Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Unifiers:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying&diff=150Topics:Pharmaceutical Lobbying2025-04-11T16:27:22Z<p>Mauricezaki: Post-Discussion Results</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Pharmaceutical Lobbying''''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Morrisson, D.<br />
* Williamson, L.<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Expertise</li><br />
<li>Benefit to society</li><br />
<li>Systemic Fairness</li><br />
<li>Private-Public Cooperation</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>The self-serving interest of lobbying tends to act over public interest, more specifically regarding public health.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can present incomplete or skewed data that might misrepresent the potential &amp; effectiveness of a treatment sector.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can aid in raising campaign contributions which may drive<br />
legislators to act against the interests of their constituents.</li><br />
<li>Historical lobbying has resulted in high drug pricing in the U.S. to support the bulk of pharmaceutical R&amp;D costs for companies worldwide.</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Proponents of PhRMA and corporate lobbying argue that PhRMA provides expertise to congress, who by and large do not have a competent enough understanding of the pharmaceutical industry to make political decisions that help the industry. However, anti-lobbyists argue that pharmaceutical lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry, and that PhRMA donations to political campaigns create an inherent conflict of interest for those politicians. While they do provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing & distribution standards. The issue is hotly debated in the United States and is often a part of broader conversations about lobbying in general, which became substantially more polarized following the citizens united supreme court case that made it easier for companies, unions, and non-profits to spend more on political campaigns with less oversight.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
# Expertise<br />
#:Congress has repeatedly passed bills that do substantial harm to the American pharmaceutical industry, with negative ramifications for pharmaceutical workers, consumers, and the country as a whole. Allowing PhRMA to lobby congress gives them a direct line to convince them to make better decisions for the country and for every stakeholder in the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical framing: Utilitarian <br />
# Benefit to society<br />
#:While arguments about profiteering are valid, the pharma industry ultimately works to save lives and improve quality of life for tens of millions of Americans. The goals of the pharma industry are goals that all Americans should share, and allowing them to lobby congress helps them achieve an ethically sound goal as long as regulation exists to ensure that profiteering isn’t the primary goal of the lobbyists. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in social contract) <br />
# Systemic Fairness<br />
#:While there are issues with pharmaceutical lobbying that could be regulated better, it would be unfair to specifically target pharmaceutical industry, who’s goals and function contribute to improving the health and well- being of everybody who needs healthcare, while ignoring other corporate lobbying groups. Zooming out even further, specifically arguing against corporate lobby groups while ignoring other lobby groups like nonprofits, unions, policy thinktanks, and international groups unnecessarily targets companies. Ethical framing: Deontological (fairness based) (4) Private-Public Cooperation – Allowing pharmaceutical companies to lobby congress and federal agencies helps streamline the process of private-public collaboration in pharmaceutical and related healthcare applications. Private- public collaboration has produced societal projects with the greatest impact on improving qualify of life in America, and hindering corporate lobbying is a move in the wrong direction for creating more of these projects. Ethical framing: Both utilitarian and deontological (duty/social contract)<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
Lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry. While they provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing & distribution standards. This self- serving behavior can be demonstrated by the staggering amounts invested in campaign contributions and continually climbing U.S. drug prices.<br />
<br />
# The self-serving interest of lobbying tends to act over public interest, more specifically regarding public health. Pharmaceutical lobbying has an inherent profit-driven interest that conflicts with the needs of the public. Given their clear ties to industry funding, they cannot claim to fuel progress that solely benefits the consumer. <br />
# Lobbyists can present incomplete or skewed data that might misrepresent the potential & effectiveness of a treatment sector. One argument for lobbying is the specific expertise and interpretations they can provide for ongoing pharmaceutical research. While they might have a deeper understanding of innovations compared to the average legislator, they are motivated to present the best possible interpretation while minimizing risks to the consumers. Their biases can misrepresent the potential for a treatment and result in wasteful spending from tax dollars allocated to fund this research. <br />
# Lobbyists can aid in raising campaign contributions which may drive legislators to act against the interests of their constituents. While lobbying cannot directly funnel funding to politicians, there are clear workarounds in U.S. funding laws via PACs that are commonly exploited to provide campaign contributions. The favors levied from these contributions can spark uncertainty on whether legislators are working in the interests of their constituents when overseeing drug pricing reforms and relations of drug development & distribution standards. <br />
# Historical lobbying has resulted in high drug pricing in the U.S. to support the bulk of pharmaceutical R&D costs for companies worldwide. Despite what defenders of pharmaceutical lobbyists will argue, the state of drug pricing in the United States is a prime example of how lobbying has benefitted the companies at the cost of the consumer. As it stands, the United States is the only major country without strict caps on drug pricing which means the bulk of R&D costs of pharmaceutical companies is mostly supported by the exorbitantly high drug prices which restricts treatment accessibility as a clear detriment to public health.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/BFis2cpdRiDueNHi6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/BFis2cpdRiDueNHi6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Post-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Post-Discussion<br />
File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre & Post-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pro & Con Arguments Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pro Arguments<br />
File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png|Plasticity for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Con Arguments<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:PharmaLobbying_CON_Plasticity.png&diff=149File:PharmaLobbying CON Plasticity.png2025-04-11T16:25:18Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Pharma Lobbying CON Plasticity</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:PharmaLobbying_PRO_Plasticity.png&diff=148File:PharmaLobbying PRO Plasticity.png2025-04-11T16:24:57Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Pharma Lobbying PRO Plasticity</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:Pharma_Lobbying_DA_PrePost.png&diff=147File:Pharma Lobbying DA PrePost.png2025-04-11T16:24:32Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Pharma Lobbying DA Pre & Post</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:PharmaLobbying_SeeSaw_Post.png&diff=146File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Post.png2025-04-11T16:24:05Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>Pharma Lobbying SeeSaw Post</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=145Main Page2025-04-11T13:51:26Z<p>Mauricezaki: New Topic Added</p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
=Welcome to Unifiers' Movement= <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Genetically Modified Organisms]]''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. ([[Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Jahnavi; Noah''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
<br />
<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Previous Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
'''[[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Pharmaceutical Lobbying]]''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. ([[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Morrisson, D.; Williamson, L.''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=144Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-11T13:51:07Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''' (GMOs), are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Genetically_Modified_Organisms&diff=143Topics:Genetically Modified Organisms2025-04-11T13:45:00Z<p>Mauricezaki: New Topic - GMOs</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Genetically Modified Organisms''''', (GMOs) are any organisms whose DNA has been altered using biotechnology to introduce certain traits. In agriculture industry, GMO crops are engineered to resist pests and herbicides, improve shelf life, enhance nutritional value and enhance flavor. Developing these traits naturally would take several generations, but genetic modification fastens this process. Commonly grown GMO crops include cotton, corn and soybean Supporters argue that GMOs enable higher food production, which is essential for feeding a growing global population. While GMO foods have significantly increased agricultural productivity by reducing the crop losses due to pest infestation and minimizing food wastage due to longer shelf life, but there are concerns regarding the health impacts with the usage of these GMO foods. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Genetically Modified Organisms. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Jahnavi<br />
* Noah<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Increased Crop Yields</li><br />
<li>Improved Resistance to Pests and Diseases</li><br />
<li>Enhanced Nutritional Content</li><br />
<li>Greater Food Security in a Changing Climate</li><br />
<li>Reduced Environmental Impact</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Lack of safety studies</li><br />
<li>Increased Herbicide use</li><br />
<li>Environmental contamination</li><br />
<li>Allergen and Health risk</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Genetically_Modified_Organisms" src="https://forms.gle/Qt6Tdzrz5USRzD1L7" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<!--<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Genetically Modified Organisms Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Genetically Modified Organisms Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery>--><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying&diff=142Topics:Pharmaceutical Lobbying2025-04-08T17:33:13Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Pharmaceutical Lobbying''''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Morrisson, D.<br />
* Williamson, L.<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Expertise</li><br />
<li>Benefit to society</li><br />
<li>Systemic Fairness</li><br />
<li>Private-Public Cooperation</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>The self-serving interest of lobbying tends to act over public interest, more specifically regarding public health.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can present incomplete or skewed data that might misrepresent the potential &amp; effectiveness of a treatment sector.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can aid in raising campaign contributions which may drive<br />
legislators to act against the interests of their constituents.</li><br />
<li>Historical lobbying has resulted in high drug pricing in the U.S. to support the bulk of pharmaceutical R&amp;D costs for companies worldwide.</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Discussion Summary ==<br />
<br />
Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Proponents of PhRMA and corporate lobbying argue that PhRMA provides expertise to congress, who by and large do not have a competent enough understanding of the pharmaceutical industry to make political decisions that help the industry. However, anti-lobbyists argue that pharmaceutical lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry, and that PhRMA donations to political campaigns create an inherent conflict of interest for those politicians. While they do provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing & distribution standards. The issue is hotly debated in the United States and is often a part of broader conversations about lobbying in general, which became substantially more polarized following the citizens united supreme court case that made it easier for companies, unions, and non-profits to spend more on political campaigns with less oversight.<br />
<br />
===Arguments For===<br />
<br />
# Expertise<br />
#:Congress has repeatedly passed bills that do substantial harm to the American pharmaceutical industry, with negative ramifications for pharmaceutical workers, consumers, and the country as a whole. Allowing PhRMA to lobby congress gives them a direct line to convince them to make better decisions for the country and for every stakeholder in the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical framing: Utilitarian <br />
# Benefit to society<br />
#:While arguments about profiteering are valid, the pharma industry ultimately works to save lives and improve quality of life for tens of millions of Americans. The goals of the pharma industry are goals that all Americans should share, and allowing them to lobby congress helps them achieve an ethically sound goal as long as regulation exists to ensure that profiteering isn’t the primary goal of the lobbyists. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in social contract) <br />
# Systemic Fairness<br />
#:While there are issues with pharmaceutical lobbying that could be regulated better, it would be unfair to specifically target pharmaceutical industry, who’s goals and function contribute to improving the health and well- being of everybody who needs healthcare, while ignoring other corporate lobbying groups. Zooming out even further, specifically arguing against corporate lobby groups while ignoring other lobby groups like nonprofits, unions, policy thinktanks, and international groups unnecessarily targets companies. Ethical framing: Deontological (fairness based) (4) Private-Public Cooperation – Allowing pharmaceutical companies to lobby congress and federal agencies helps streamline the process of private-public collaboration in pharmaceutical and related healthcare applications. Private- public collaboration has produced societal projects with the greatest impact on improving qualify of life in America, and hindering corporate lobbying is a move in the wrong direction for creating more of these projects. Ethical framing: Both utilitarian and deontological (duty/social contract)<br />
<br />
===Arguments Against===<br />
Lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry. While they provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing & distribution standards. This self- serving behavior can be demonstrated by the staggering amounts invested in campaign contributions and continually climbing U.S. drug prices.<br />
<br />
# The self-serving interest of lobbying tends to act over public interest, more specifically regarding public health. Pharmaceutical lobbying has an inherent profit-driven interest that conflicts with the needs of the public. Given their clear ties to industry funding, they cannot claim to fuel progress that solely benefits the consumer. <br />
# Lobbyists can present incomplete or skewed data that might misrepresent the potential & effectiveness of a treatment sector. One argument for lobbying is the specific expertise and interpretations they can provide for ongoing pharmaceutical research. While they might have a deeper understanding of innovations compared to the average legislator, they are motivated to present the best possible interpretation while minimizing risks to the consumers. Their biases can misrepresent the potential for a treatment and result in wasteful spending from tax dollars allocated to fund this research. <br />
# Lobbyists can aid in raising campaign contributions which may drive legislators to act against the interests of their constituents. While lobbying cannot directly funnel funding to politicians, there are clear workarounds in U.S. funding laws via PACs that are commonly exploited to provide campaign contributions. The favors levied from these contributions can spark uncertainty on whether legislators are working in the interests of their constituents when overseeing drug pricing reforms and relations of drug development & distribution standards. <br />
# Historical lobbying has resulted in high drug pricing in the U.S. to support the bulk of pharmaceutical R&D costs for companies worldwide. Despite what defenders of pharmaceutical lobbyists will argue, the state of drug pricing in the United States is a prime example of how lobbying has benefitted the companies at the cost of the consumer. As it stands, the United States is the only major country without strict caps on drug pricing which means the bulk of R&D costs of pharmaceutical companies is mostly supported by the exorbitantly high drug prices which restricts treatment accessibility as a clear detriment to public health.<br />
<br />
== Vote Post-Discussion ==<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/BFis2cpdRiDueNHi6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, view results, be notified when there are updates, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<html><br />
<iframe key="Pharmaceutical_Lobbying" src="https://forms.gle/BFis2cpdRiDueNHi6" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html><br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying&diff=141Topics:Pharmaceutical Lobbying2025-04-08T17:24:01Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Pharmaceutical Lobbying''''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. <br />
<br />
== Team == <br />
* Morrisson, D.<br />
* Williamson, L.<br />
<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)'' <br />
<br />
== Arguments == <br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px;"<br />
|-<br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; border:1px solid #CEF2E0;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;"> Pro arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>Expertise</li><br />
<li>Benefit to society</li><br />
<li>Systemic Fairness</li><br />
<li>Private-Public Cooperation</li><br />
</ul><br />
! style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF5FA; border:1px solid #F2CEDD;" | <br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:4px 0px 6px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;">Con arguments </div><br />
<ul style="padding-left: 12px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; text-align:left; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-weight:normal;"><br />
<li>The self-serving interest of lobbying tends to act over public interest, more specifically regarding public health.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can present incomplete or skewed data that might misrepresent the potential &amp; effectiveness of a treatment sector.</li><br />
<li>Lobbyists can aid in raising campaign contributions which may drive<br />
legislators to act against the interests of their constituents.</li><br />
<li>Historical lobbying has resulted in high drug pricing in the U.S. to support the bulk of pharmaceutical R&amp;D costs for companies worldwide.</li><br />
</ul><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== Vote Pre-Discussion Results ==<br />
<br />
{{#ifeq: <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}| |}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| 1 <br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
| {{#ifexpr: <br />
{{#expr: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} - {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|.|}}}} }} >= 3 <br />
OR <br />
{{#ifeq: {{#len:{{#USERNAME:}}}} | {{#len:{{#replace:{{#USERNAME:}}|:}}}} | 0 | 1 }} <br />
| <br />
<br />
{{{!}} style="border:1px solid #CEDFF2; background-color:#F6FAFF; padding:0px; width:100%;"<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} <br />
{{{!}} style="border-spacing:6px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; width:100%;" <!-- Added border-spacing for proper spacing --><br />
{{!}}-<br />
! style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; font-weight:bold; font-size:16px;" {{!}} Become a member/Login and vote<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}}<br />
{{!}}-<br />
{{!}} style="background-color:#FEF6E7; border:2px solid #A66200; padding:8px 12px; text-align:left;" {{!}} '''You are not logged in.''' In order to vote, to be notified when there are updates, and new votes are required, you can [{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} log in] or [{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount|returnto={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} create an account].<br />
{{!}}}<br />
{{!}}}<br />
<br />
| <br />
<br />
<!--<html><br />
<iframe key="Human_Cloning/In_Utero_Gene_Editing" src="https://forms.gle/kSK1L6n3JbG4n3uQ8" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading…</iframe><br />
</html>--><br />
<gallery heights=300px mode=packed caption="Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion Voting Results"><br />
File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png|SeeSaw Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png|Driving Argument Distribution for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Voting Pre-Discussion<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
<br />
}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:Topics]]</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:PharmaLobbying_DA_Pre_1col.png&diff=140File:PharmaLobbying DA Pre 1col.png2025-04-08T17:22:47Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>DA Model for Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=File:PharmaLobbying_SeeSaw_Pre.png&diff=139File:PharmaLobbying SeeSaw Pre.png2025-04-08T17:21:14Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>SeeSaw Model Pharmaceutical Lobbying Pre-Discussion</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=138Main Page2025-04-07T16:34:27Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
=Welcome to Unifiers' Movement= <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Pharmaceutical Lobbying]]''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. ([[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Morrisson, D.; Williamson, L.''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Today's Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
* '''Expertise''': Congress has repeatedly passed bills that do substantial harm to the American pharmaceutical industry, with negative ramifications for pharmaceutical workers, consumers, and the country as a whole. Allowing PhRMA to lobby congress gives them a direct line to convince them to make better decisions for the country and for every stakeholder in the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical framing: Utilitarian<br />
* '''Benefit to society''': While arguments about profiteering are valid, the pharma industry ultimately works to save lives and improve quality of life for tens of millions of Americans. The goals of the pharma industry are goals that all Americans should share, and allowing them to lobby congress helps them achieve an ethically sound goal as long as regulation exists to ensure that profiteering isn’t the primary goal of the lobbyists. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in social contract)<br />
<!--<br />
* '''Systemic Fairness''': While there are issues with pharmaceutical lobbying that could be regulated better, it would be unfair to specifically target pharmaceutical industry, who’s goals and function contribute to improving the health and well-being of everybody who needs healthcare, while ignoring other corporate lobbying groups. Zooming out even further, specifically arguing against corporate lobby groups while ignoring other lobby groups like nonprofits, unions, policy thinktanks, and international groups unnecessarily targets companies. Ethical framing: Deontological (fairness based)<br />
* '''Private-Public Cooperation''': Allowing pharmaceutical companies to lobby congress and federal agencies helps streamline the process of private-public collaboration in pharmaceutical and related healthcare applications. Private-public collaboration has produced societal projects with the greatest impact on improving qualify of life in America, and hindering corporate lobbying is a move in the wrong direction for creating more of these projects. Ethical framing: Both utilitarian and deontological (duty/social contract)<br />
--><br />
* Lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry. While they provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing &amp; distribution standards. This self-serving behavior can be demonstrated by the staggering amounts invested in campaign contributions and continually climbing U.S. drug prices.<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=137Main Page2025-04-07T16:33:56Z<p>Mauricezaki: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
=Welcome to Unifiers' Movement= <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Pharmaceutical_Lobbying]]''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. ([[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Morrisson, D.; Williamson, L.''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Today's Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
* '''Expertise''': Congress has repeatedly passed bills that do substantial harm to the American pharmaceutical industry, with negative ramifications for pharmaceutical workers, consumers, and the country as a whole. Allowing PhRMA to lobby congress gives them a direct line to convince them to make better decisions for the country and for every stakeholder in the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical framing: Utilitarian<br />
* '''Benefit to society''': While arguments about profiteering are valid, the pharma industry ultimately works to save lives and improve quality of life for tens of millions of Americans. The goals of the pharma industry are goals that all Americans should share, and allowing them to lobby congress helps them achieve an ethically sound goal as long as regulation exists to ensure that profiteering isn’t the primary goal of the lobbyists. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in social contract)<br />
<!--<br />
* '''Systemic Fairness''': While there are issues with pharmaceutical lobbying that could be regulated better, it would be unfair to specifically target pharmaceutical industry, who’s goals and function contribute to improving the health and well-being of everybody who needs healthcare, while ignoring other corporate lobbying groups. Zooming out even further, specifically arguing against corporate lobby groups while ignoring other lobby groups like nonprofits, unions, policy thinktanks, and international groups unnecessarily targets companies. Ethical framing: Deontological (fairness based)<br />
* '''Private-Public Cooperation''': Allowing pharmaceutical companies to lobby congress and federal agencies helps streamline the process of private-public collaboration in pharmaceutical and related healthcare applications. Private-public collaboration has produced societal projects with the greatest impact on improving qualify of life in America, and hindering corporate lobbying is a move in the wrong direction for creating more of these projects. Ethical framing: Both utilitarian and deontological (duty/social contract)<br />
--><br />
* Lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry. While they provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing &amp; distribution standards. This self-serving behavior can be demonstrated by the staggering amounts invested in campaign contributions and continually climbing U.S. drug prices.<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezakihttps://gckymxzq.a2hosted.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=136Main Page2025-04-07T16:32:53Z<p>Mauricezaki: today's topic update</p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable" style="border-spacing:3px; border-collapse:separate; background-color:transparent; border:none;"<br />
|-<br />
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#f8f9fa; padding:10px; text-align:center;" | <br />
=Welcome to Unifiers' Movement= <br />
<small>the Balanced Arguments to Global Issues.</small><br />
|-<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;" | <div style="background-color:#CEF2E0; border:2px solid #A3BFB1; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''From Today's Controversial Topic'''</div> <br />
<br />
'''[[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Pharmaceutical_Lobbying]]''', Pharmaceutical industry lobbying comprises one of the most powerful and high spending corporate lobby groups in the United States, spearheaded by the PhRMA industry group. Doctoral students were asked to take "Pro", "Con", and "In Between" positions regarding the usefulness and harm of Pharmaceutical Lobbying. ([[Topics:Pharmaceutical_Lobbying|Full topic...]])<br />
<br />
''Credit: Morrisson, D.; Williamson, L.''<br />
''(authors and sources listed alphabetically)''<br />
| style="width:50%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#F6FAFF;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#CEDFF2; border:2px solid #A3B0BF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Today's Topic Discussion'''</div><br />
* '''Expertise''': Congress has repeatedly passed bills that do substantial harm to the American pharmaceutical industry, with negative ramifications for pharmaceutical workers, consumers, and the country as a whole. Allowing PhRMA to lobby congress gives them a direct line to convince them to make better decisions for the country and for every stakeholder in the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical framing: Utilitarian<br />
* '''Benefit to society''': While arguments about profiteering are valid, the pharma industry ultimately works to save lives and improve quality of life for tens of millions of Americans. The goals of the pharma industry are goals that all Americans should share, and allowing them to lobby congress helps them achieve an ethically sound goal as long as regulation exists to ensure that profiteering isn’t the primary goal of the lobbyists. Ethical framing: Deontological (rooted in social contract)<br />
* '''Systemic Fairness''': While there are issues with pharmaceutical lobbying that could be regulated better, it would be unfair to specifically target pharmaceutical industry, who’s goals and function contribute to improving the health and well-being of everybody who needs healthcare, while ignoring other corporate lobbying groups. Zooming out even further, specifically arguing against corporate lobby groups while ignoring other lobby groups like nonprofits, unions, policy thinktanks, and international groups unnecessarily targets companies. Ethical framing: Deontological (fairness based)<br />
* '''Private-Public Cooperation''': Allowing pharmaceutical companies to lobby congress and federal agencies helps streamline the process of private-public collaboration in pharmaceutical and related healthcare applications. Private-public collaboration has produced societal projects with the greatest impact on improving qualify of life in America, and hindering corporate lobbying is a move in the wrong direction for creating more of these projects. Ethical framing: Both utilitarian and deontological (duty/social contract)<br />
* Lobbying practices have an inherent self-preserving interest given most groups have direct ties to the profit-driven industry. While they provide expertise for ongoing research, their profit-driven biases can result in presenting incomplete findings on treatments, promoting high drug prices, and relaxing drug testing &amp; distribution standards. This self-serving behavior can be demonstrated by the staggering amounts invested in campaign contributions and continually climbing U.S. drug prices.<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#FFF5FA;" |<br />
<div style="background-color:#F2CEDD; border:2px solid #BFA3AF; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''About The Unifiers’ Movement (UM)'''</div><br />
UM is a global non-profit organization which aims to engage interested scholars with differing views in examining important global societal issues and developing publishable respected arguments that can serve as trustworthy sources to individuals, families, organizations, governments, etc., to express their own informed positions on the issue. These positions will continue being re-examined as new evidence becomes available and being re-adjusted in addendum publications so that they can remain relevant and current. UM will know it is doing its job when it gets closest to achieving unification through a robust balance that becomes increasingly difficult to tip. ([[Unifiers:About|Read more...]])<br />
|-<br />
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#faf5ff;" | <div style="background-color:#ddcef2; border:2px solid #afa3bf; padding:8px; margin:2px 0px 3px 0px; text-align:left; width:auto; max-width:100%; display:block;">'''Unifiers' Movement Book'''</div><br />
<br />
<div id="mp-tfp" ><br />
<table role="presentation" style="margin:0 0 3px; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; text-align:left; background-color:transparent; border-collapse:collapse;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="padding:0 0.9em 0 0; width:280px; vertical-align:top;"><span typeof="mw:File"><table style="border: 1px solid #c1c1c1; background-color:#ffffff;"><tr><td style=""><div style="display: block; height: 320px;"><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; background-color:#ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: large; font-weight: bold; top: 25px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Unifiers' Movement</span><span style="position: relative; text-align: center; left: 0px; color: #000000; font-size: x-small; font-weight: 500; top: 24px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments to global issues</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:UnifiersLogo.jpg|frameless|center]]<span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Balanced arguments </span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 3px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -30px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">to Global Issues</span><span style="position: relative; width: fit-content; left: 175px; color: #000000; font-size: xx-small; font-weight: bold; top: -58px; display: block; z-index: 9000;">Diomedes Logothetis</span></div></td></tr></table></span><br />
</td><br />
<td style="padding: 0 6px 0 0; vertical-align:top;"><br />
<p><b>THE UNIFIERS’ MOVEMENT</b><br><br><br />
<br />
Can the motivation for a unified problem-solving approach be to work together to leave the world a better place than we found it? A world contained by ethical boundaries, where we regain our trust and reject our fear of each other? A world unified and not divided?<br />
<br><br><br />
This book proposes a path toward unifying solutions to problems!<br />
</p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Dedicated to:&nbsp;the next generation (to Adrian, Liam, co-authors: Adam, Dean, and all the children and grandchildren of the world)</small></p><br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><small>Credit:&nbsp;John Basl (ch.1), David E. Clapham (ch.4), Miguel Fribourg-Casajuana (ch.6), Diomedes E. Logothetis (Prologue and ch.1-7), Frederick Sigworth (ch.3), Stelios M. Smirnakis (ch.2), Raimond Winslow (ch.6), Maurice Zaki, TBD (ch.5, ch.7) (authors listed alphabetically)&nbsp;</small></p><br />
</div><br />
<br />
[[TheBook|Download / Buy Book]]<br />
</div><br />
</td></tr></table></div><br />
|}</div>Mauricezaki